On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, An Metet wrote: > It's also rather interesting that Aimee is objecting to > people "cowering behind remailers". On the cypherpunk list? > On the contrary, we should all be using remailers. Someone > seriously does need to start a node which only accepts posts > from remailers. What about a CDR node that strips all to:/from: info before sending it out? A 'cypherpunks_anon@...' w/ replyto: set to itself. Would that be an acceptable approach? It could be made closed so that only subscribers could use it (which implies the info functions would be disabled), or open so that anyone could use it.
- Re: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Declan McCullagh
- Re: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Declan McCullagh
- Motives georgemw
- Re: Motives Bill Stewart
- RE: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Aimee Farr
- RE: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Aimee Farr
- Re: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition John Young
- We are all trolls Morlock Elloi
- RE: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition An Metet
- RE: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Aimee Farr
- RE: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Jim Choate
- RE: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Aimee Farr
- Re: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Dr. Evil
- Re: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Eugene Leitl
- RE: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Anonymous Remailer
- RE: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Faustine
- Re: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Anonymous
- Re: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Bill Stewart
- Re: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Bill Stewart
- Re: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Eugene Leitl
- Re: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition Faustine