-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>At 08:26 PM 9/13/2001 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
>>Bell's "Assassination Politics" put cypherpunks on some protective
>intelligence agendas. It would not be implausible to assume you were being
>monitored to see if you "run" with the seeded assassination memes, if only
>for analytical purposes. These matters are taken seriously by those charged
>with the care of protected persons. (Contrary to what some here would have
>you believe, subtlety can get you a much higher threat-rating than overtly
>threatening correspondence.)
>
>Jim is a fool though not a dangerous one. No one should consider implementing any
>betting pools till there is enough cover traffic from "legit" digital cash apps. If
>one were to be created this would be an ideal time and Ben Laden the ideal target.
>How many Americans would consider creating such a pool to be evil?
>
>> Rising to the bait, debating whether such-and-such a purpose is
>> behind Farr's postings, speculating on Farr's true intent, all
>> this does is spur on the postings, the baiting, the provocation.
>> Just say "no" to responding to ANY of Farr's postings, and I
>> would almost put money that the behavior will extinguish within a week.
>
>>Baiting? Provocation? No, a caveat. Do not tolerate behavior of that nature.
>It subjects you all to scrutiny and mischaracterization.
>
>>What about Mr. K-S that hides behind his hushmail jacket
>
>Don't forget the power tie ;-)
>
>>and asks for names
>and addresses.....why doesn't somebody cuss him out?
>
>What, for protected speech and actions?
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Hush 2.0
wmAEARECACAFAjuhpoAZHGtleXNlci1zb3plQGh1c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRAg4ui5IoBV
n5ptAJ9QKvtPlXbf1nP8ee0uAVTMq4sTiwCgr5PcgT1k7+cwVzKb3BjuwChoCv4=
=8WNj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
