At 01:23 PM 9/18/02 -0700, Morlock Elloi wrote: >> Better than a radar detector for emissionless, but visible, cops. Over >> the hill coverage. Issues of > >This will be banned under WIPO and copyright laws
Yep. Won't anyone think of the chiiiildren? >I think that some radar detectors have this built-in. Inter-("consumer")-node automatic communication of antisocial information over pirate protocols? I don't think so. Yet :-) I'm suggesting that end-user-configurable RF comp/comm devices are a quantum step in the development of "consumer" electronics in the us-vs.-pigs arms race. Or could be. Look dude, I'm just porting/downshifting the Rural Optical Signalling Protocol to a blog-like RF mesh network with a better horizon. You can ignore those noise bursts if you like :-) The main problem is >localisation - each district seem to be using different frequences. Could it be >that They are aware of dangers of the monoculture ? Frequencies are just bit patterns to a digitally controlled oscillator. DCOs are agile, dude. Got spectrum?