I wrote: > If I recall some time ago (years ago) there was some discussion on > list of using non-US drivers licenses or out-of-state drivers licenses > I think to get around this problem. I thought it was Duncan Frissell > or Black Unicorn who offered some opinions on this.
Below looks like the comment from Duncan that I was thinking of (looks like Duncan had similar discussion on other groups): I wonder what the limits of this are. eg. if you could drive indefinately on one of these licenses it would solve the problem. Adam http://digest.textfiles.com/CPD/v3_070.txt | From: Duncan Frissell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Newsgroups: comp.society.privacy | Subject: Re: SSN required to renew | Date: 4 Nov 1993 14:28:14 -0500 | Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC | | T >If anyone knows a state that positively does NOT require SSN, I'd | T >like to | T >know... I hacked the 1 January 1993 changeover by renewing my | T >license two | T >years early, so I have until 1996 to find a way around this. | | The "State" of Bitish Columbia certainly doesn't. <G> | | Likewise, the UK, France, Tanzania, the Faroe Islands or other places that | issue driver's licenses that can still be used to operate vehicles on | California highways. | -More- | Duncan Frissell | | P.S. I heard a rumor that California was banning operation of out-of-state | vehicles that had no auto insurance even if they were driven by genuine | tourists. People from Wisconsin, say. Anyone know if this is true.
