On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 00:22, bgt wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 10:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > That made Silveira the law of the land, you see. > > That means that no American citizen, since December 1, 2003, has a fundamental > > right to possess a firearm. > > Only in the 9th circuit.
I should've said: only in the 9th circuit, in states that don't have a state constitutional provision regarding right to keep and bear arms. I believe the only state that falls in that category is CA. Every other state in the 9th circuit has a constitutional provision that is usually even more explicit than the 2nd ammendment. Most explicitly state the /individual/ has the right to keep and bear arms (as opposed to "the people" which some courts have interpreted to mean "the state" or state-approved/regulated militias). For example, NV is typical: "Every citizen has the right to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes." Article 1, Section 11, Paragraph 1. --bgt
