What I don't yet fully grasp is why they bother. I suppose there are the following, but I suspect there's one key thing in their minds:
1) Scope out potential sources of arrestability.
2) Intimidate into "straighten up and fly right"
3) Pre-BB or not so-BB-work: Readily available weapons, etc...in case of raid?
4) Just sniffing out the orietation/motivations...ie, raghead or non-raghead?
Of the above I consider 3) Unlikely, 2) Not superlikely, 1) Fairly likely and 4) Most probable.
-TD
From: "Trei, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Trei, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "John Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Another John Young Sighting
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:21:28 -0400
After some hiccups, I got a copy to Riad S. Wahby, and he has posted it at http://web.mit.edu/rsw/Public/JohnYoung040820.mpg
Thanks, Riad!
Peter
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Trei, Peter > Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 10:11 PM > To: John Young; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Another John Young Sighting > > > I caught the rerun. I have John's appearence as an mpg; > 13 Mb at VCD qual, ~65 at DVD qual. I think <2 minutes > of a 30 minute show counts as fair use. > > If someone can take that much as a mail attachment, > or has an acessible ftp site, I'd be happy to send it. > I'd prefer someone who can post it for others. > > It's funny, but not deep. > > Peter > >
_________________________________________________________________
Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools and more! http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx
