David Carter wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Ken Murchison wrote:
I applied this patch to CVS, but I'm wondering why the original code
writes directly to the existing cyrus.index instead of a
cyrus.index.NEW, as is done in other places. I don't know if this was
intentional by the previous authors, or an oversight. I'm going to
investigate.
Doesn't cyrus.index.NEW only kick in on expunge?
I believe so. If we also used it for appends, we wouldn't run into the
problem that Fastmail is seeing. But, it may be too much of a
performance hit.
--
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
