Øyvind Kolbu wrote: > Hi, > Hi Oyvind (apologies for bastardizing your name like that),
I have a couple of remarks, inline. > can 8a23d03fa441f76026e923ac86533d6f85b11064 be backported to 2.4? > If so strconcat must be backported as well, that is commit > 3f1cc0a7f1e7afb0e52a99d27982a7d94d9bff85. > 8a23d03fa441f76026e923ac86533d6f85b11064 seems to change the default database technology for the ptscache, which should not happen in a stable release. This we can overcome, but I would have appreciated you pointing this out alongside your request for the backporting of said commit ;-) That said, for the records to reflect this request, and for things to show up on the radar for the appropriate people (e.g. me in this case), please consider closing #3185 with almost exactly the message you have now sent to the mailing list, and set the 'releng-backport' "flag" (upper right corner on the bug) to '?'. Procedural detail, I know, but it aids us in various areas. All of the former aside, noted I have no objections, I'm going to let Bron have his say on this. > We are running with both patches applied against 2.4.8alpha1, and it works > as expected. > > 8a23d03fa441f76026e923ac86533d6f85b11064 introduced some typos in > lib/imapoptions, which is fixed in attached patch. > Thanks! Applied to master and pushed out with, of course, full attribution. > #3185 can now be closed. Done. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- Senior Engineer, Kolab Systems AG e: vanmeeu...@kolabsys.com t: +316 42 801 403 w: http://www.kolabsys.com pgp: 9342 BF08