On 2011-04-07 at 16:47, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > Øyvind Kolbu wrote: > > > can 8a23d03fa441f76026e923ac86533d6f85b11064 be backported to 2.4? > > If so strconcat must be backported as well, that is commit > > 3f1cc0a7f1e7afb0e52a99d27982a7d94d9bff85. > > > > 8a23d03fa441f76026e923ac86533d6f85b11064 seems to change the default database > technology for the ptscache, which should not happen in a stable release. > > This we can overcome, but I would have appreciated you pointing this out > alongside your request for the backporting of said commit ;-)
Sorry, didn't notice. We don't use ptsloader. > That said, for the records to reflect this request, and for things to show up > on the radar for the appropriate people (e.g. me in this case), please > consider closing #3185 with almost exactly the message you have now sent to > the mailing list, and set the 'releng-backport' "flag" (upper right corner on > the bug) to '?'. Procedural detail, I know, but it aids us in various > areas. I tried to do that no, but was unable to do so. Perhaps because you closed it? > All of the former aside, noted I have no objections, I'm going to let > Bron have his say on this. OK. > > 8a23d03fa441f76026e923ac86533d6f85b11064 introduced some typos in > > lib/imapoptions, which is fixed in attached patch. > > > > Thanks! Applied to master and pushed out with, of course, full > attribution. Great :) -- Øyvind Kolbu Postmaster University of Oslo
pgpzkS7f1q8uA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
