Gabriel Gellner wrote: >> [X] No, that would bloat the language and/or the compiler/project too >> much, I'd prefer to see this in a standalone tool/plugin >> >> > Just my opinion, but f2py rocks at this, so it seems like a distraction to me. > That's certainly a valid argument against this.
In my opinion, using f2py is a bit like using SWIG or ctypes; though we are still using Cython? When I'm using Cython I'd like Fortran access to be closer to the metal and not do the Fortran call through the entire Python stack. (Also f2py needs some work to wrap the libraries I work with (using assumed-shape arrays), and doesn't pass non-contiguous buffers and non-NumPy PEP-3118 buffers. As far as I understand anyway.) Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
