Vic Kelson wrote: > > I like the proposed approach, and I'm not sure at all that we need the > Fortran scanner (unless Cython scans an INTERFACE block), because it's > a lot of work. The proposed approach offers the programmer the ability > to call Fortran from Cython without having to deal with all the ins > and outs of C/Fortran integration. Indeed, with native Fortran calling convention in Cython, one could reuse the f2py Fortran scanner and generate the necesarry Cython pxd files from it (i.e. as a non-Cython utility script). Though I've seen one or two projects which seem to have higher-quality Fortran scanners than f2py that may be a better starting point.
Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
