Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Robert Bradshaw > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >> >> >>> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> >>> >>>> There's >>>> another regression, "cdef int complex" doesn't work anymore (our >>>> structs used to support this, as does gcc, even if it's non-c99). >>>> >>> Turns out this broke nearly all my own code :-( I'll give a proper >>> solution a go. >>> >> Thanks! It think it should be pretty easy (probably can use the type >> name, rather than the math postfix marker to name the methods...) >> >> http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/446 >> >> > > Or use other approach for handling "int complex" types. Honestly, I > did not take into account this use case. > > Mmm... I'm thinking that trying to support (floating) complex in C89 > is not a good idea, some things are really hard to do (if ever > possible)... > Huh? Do you mean what's there already?
Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
