On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <[email protected]> wrote: > Lisandro Dalcin wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Robert Bradshaw >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:45 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> There's >>>>> another regression, "cdef int complex" doesn't work anymore (our >>>>> structs used to support this, as does gcc, even if it's non-c99). >>>>> >>>> Turns out this broke nearly all my own code :-( I'll give a proper >>>> solution a go. >>>> >>> Thanks! It think it should be pretty easy (probably can use the type >>> name, rather than the math postfix marker to name the methods...) >>> >>> http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/446 >>> >>> >> >> Or use other approach for handling "int complex" types. Honestly, I >> did not take into account this use case. >> >> Mmm... I'm thinking that trying to support (floating) complex in C89 >> is not a good idea, some things are really hard to do (if ever >> possible)... >> > Huh? Do you mean what's there already? >
No, just the "Seamless" support... I mean, if the 'ccomplex' directive is not on, then make Cython generate an error when external ctypedefs are used, and any other situation where there is ambiguity... -- Lisandro Dalcín --------------- Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
