On 11/30/10 4:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Robert Kern<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> On 11/30/10 3:31 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Vitja Makarov<[email protected]>    
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't like the idea to add one more external dependency. But if that
>>>> really helps its okay.
>>>
>>> It's not an external dependency if it ships with Python. Actually,
>>> ctypes didn't ship with Python until 2.5, so that may be an issue. I'm
>>> thinking we'd only use it where we couldn't do it otherwise.
>>
>> ctypes/libffi is deliberately considered an optional component of Python for
>> several reasons, one of which is the lack of support on certain platforms. I
>> would say that it exists in a somewhat unique middle ground between "ships 
>> with
>> Python" and "external dependency".
>
> Thanks for the perspective. Are there any good alternatives
> (especially that would be less of an "external" dependency)?

I'm afraid not.

-- 
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
  that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
  an underlying truth."
   -- Umberto Eco

_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to