On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:11 AM, mark florisson <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 14 January 2011 12:08, mark florisson <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 14 January 2011 12:06, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: >>> >>> Robert Bradshaw, 14.01.2011 10:05: >>> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> >>> mark florisson, 13.01.2011 12:05: >>> >>>> In any case, there are virtually no changes when the --gdb >>> >>>> flag is inactive. These last additions would be very welcome [...] >>> >>> >>> >>> Ok, here's a general statement. I personally consider the debugging >>> >>> support >>> >>> new, experimental and not a critical feature for compiler or >>> >>> language. You >>> >>> are the current maintainer of that part anyway, so I'm fine with >>> >>> merging >>> >>> the changes for 0.14.1, even unseen, as long as it doesn't break >>> >>> anything >>> >>> that's more important. >>> >> >>> >> I'm actually looking at that code right now. >>> > >>> > I've merged this. >>> >>> The build complains because it cannot find a file called >>> >>> Cython/Debugger/do_repeat.pyx >> >> I don't have it, how does it complain? >> >>> >>> Is that a missing commit? >>> >>> Stefan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cython-dev mailing list >>> Cython-dev@codespeak.net >>> http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev >> > Apparently something left that should have been removed, apologies. You can > remove it from the setup.py in the list on line 104.
Done. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
