On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, William Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Stefan Behnel <[email protected]> wrote: >> Terry Reedy, 17.01.2011 22:38: >>> A few other details confuse me, but enough for now. >> >> It's helpful to be reminded from time to time that the documentation shows >> the usual "features" of an underfinanced OpenSource project. Part of it was >> inherited from the original Pyrex documentation and suffers from bit rot, >> and some other parts were copied over from the Wiki or from talk notes and >> continue to be badly integrated with the rest. > > I recently got some new nontrivial NSF funding for a Cython workshop. > A "docathon" would be a great activity at such a workshop. > > When some Cython developers are ready to all get flown somewhere cool > to work together on Cython for a few days, all expenses paid, let me > know. I'm serious.
+1, docs would be a good topic. That and, once generators are in, a push for 1.0. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
