On Wednesday 05 May 2010 06:56:22 am Ed Leafe wrote: > On May 5, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Nate Lowrie wrote: > > Just curious. Beyond the IDE/Dev Tools, what else do you not consider > > feature complete? In other words, what do we need to round out to get > > to 1.0? > > This has been an area where Paul and I have differed for years. I've had > many people tell me that they won't even consider Dabo until it was 1.0, > because a 0.x version meant that we could still change anything and break > all their work. Since we were not planning on doing that, and had no plans > for major pieces being added to the framework (i.e., not the tools), I > thought we should have released 1.0 about 3 years ago. This is why I'm > confused as to why it's being suggested now. > > > -- Ed Leafe
Well the obvious reason is because we differ on what a 1.0 version should be. I say, like you, that the features are fixed - but I also say the code is stable and at least the features work. Today I believe we are there. BTW the biggest complain (from VFPer's on UT) I receive is not the version number but the fact Dabo depends on two guys. Johnf _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
