On Wednesday 18 April 2007 14:33, Ed Leafe wrote: > Second, we've already set adoption of SQLAlchemy to handle backend > abstraction as a goal. Instead of wasting time on all these esoteric > and unnecessary class designs, why not start investigating what it > would take to incorporate SQLAlchemy into Dabo, replacing the > dBackend stuff? At least that effort will be useful. +10 -- John Fabiani
_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
