Ed Leafe wrote: - snip - > Second, we've already set adoption of SQLAlchemy to handle backend > abstraction as a goal. Instead of wasting time on all these esoteric > and unnecessary class designs, why not start investigating what it > would take to incorporate SQLAlchemy into Dabo, replacing the > dBackend stuff? At least that effort will be useful. > > -- Ed Leafe
Yes, that would make a lot more sense. Did you think about using a easy thing on top of sqlalchemy? There is sqlelixir, which does provide a easy declarative mapping to sqlalchemy. Uwe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-users/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
