Am 2008-05-27 um 19:10 schrieb Adrian Klaver: >> I second the recommendation for sqlite. Much simpler. However, it is >> functionally single-user and for large datasets a dedicated server >> will >> be better. > One caveat about SQLite. It is has become popular as an embedded > database. Ubuntu for one uses it to store information. The problem > arises if you try to load a newer version of SQLite in a system > where it is already installed. Uninstalling the old version is not > always possible because of dependency issues. You can run versions > side by side but you need to plan this carefully as it is possible > to compile against the wrong libraries when building the new > binary. That being said I use it as a light weight datastore.
True. But if you use Python 2.5, you don't need to care about compiling your own SQLite. (Another battery included) Greetlings from Lake Constance! Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
