Paul McNett wrote: > Not coding to exceptions, but adding something perhaps overlooked. The > fact that Nate is calling moveToPK() *from the UI* tells me that we > have a candidate for a UI wrapper.
I was going to get around to wrapping this eventually so that the TreeView can accept a DataSource, DataField, and a parent field. The parent field is so that you can represent a flat dataset in a tree structure (tasks with subtasks for example). Only with the parent field does using a tree view as a data aware object make sense. > It wouldn't know about PK's, any more than it knows about row numbers, > as in the moveToRowNumber() function. I am not sure moveToRowNumber would work here, because I am not mapping the bizobj dataSet in a flat array. It's in a Tree structure. I could always store the row number in the node to row dictionary instead of the PK. I will look into rewriting it. I didn't know that moveToRowNumber method existed. Regards, Nate _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: Dabo-users@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/4a8b3b4b.4030...@gmail.com
