Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
2008/12/19 Jerry D. Hedden <jdhed...@cpan.org>:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Steve Hay <steve...@planit.com> wrote:
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
2008/12/19 karl williamson <pub...@khwilliamson.com>:
Two things: when I do as above using rsync, I merely get a list of
the valid perl sources. If I change the :: to a slash, I actually
get the files. However, .patch contains
"blead 20081219.17:05:08 b1fccde5a5d6d9eece3886ce5cb9dc7b9027bee2"
which doesn't compile well.
What is exactly the problem with that ? I don't think anything relies
on .patch being an integer, but I might be wrong.
Nothing wrong with it here. I did a little smoke test using the new
rsync source earlier, and it built fine (see attached).
It may work, but those type of change numbers are not "human readable".
You get the branch name, the timestamp, (on which you can do a
lexicographic comparison), and the SHA1 of the head. How more human
readable can we get ?
And a test fails: t/run/switches.t It's looking for just a patch number:
# Failed at run/switches.t line 265
# got '
# This is perl, v5.11.0
DEVEL"blead-20081219.17:05:08-b1fccde5a5d6d9eece3886ce5cb9dc7b9027bee2"
built for i686-linux
# (with 1 registered patch, see perl -V for more detail)
#
# Copyright 1987-2008, Larry Wall
#
# Perl may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License
or the
# GNU General Public License, which may be found in the Perl 5 source kit.
#
# Complete documentation for Perl, including FAQ lists, should be found on
# this system using "man perl" or "perldoc perl". If you have access to the
# Internet, point your browser at http://www.perl.org/, the Perl Home Page.
#
# '
# expected /(?s-xim:This is perl, v5.11.0 (?:DEVEL\d+ )?built for
i686\-linux.+Copyright.+Larry Wall.+Artistic License.+GNU General Public
License)/
