On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Henk van Oers <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, sawyer x wrote: > > > So Dancer::App and Dancer::Plugin are really not the same. >> > > I told you so. > I thought you meant that if people can use Dancer::Plugin, why can't they use Dancer::App. I probably misunderstood. > > (And Dancer::App is not a namespace yet, see: locate) > Dancer/App.pm *is* used internally. That's why Dancer/App/* is a problem. Dancer/Plugin/* is not because it's meant for that purpose. > Let me ask for an other namespace: Dancer::Loadapp I don't think that's good either. Why can't this be a plugin, by the way?
_______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
