We didn't mean Dancer::Plugin::App...
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Henk van Oers <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Yanick Champoux wrote: > > Why can't this be a plugin, by the way? >>>> >>> >> I'll make the tactical mistake of jumping into this thread before my >> first coffee, and say that I agree with Sawyer: I think that those modules >> could very well find their home in the ::Plugin namespace. >> > > OK. > The namespace Dancer::Plugin::App sounds good. > > > Typically, plugins do add keywords, but they don't have to: they can also >> extend the functionality of the application itself. >> > > Typically, load_app's do not add keywords. > That's why the Subject is "Namespace for load_app modules". > > > Henk, do you already have some of your code on GitHub? If it is, it would >> probably be easier to use one of them as an example of that I mean. >> > > On github I have Amsterdam.pm > https://github.com/hvoers/PNL/blob/master/lib/Amsterdam.pm > But I do not want to claim the Amsterdam namespace on CPAN. > > Dancer::Plugin::App::Amsterdam will do just fine. > > I'll make a Dancer::Plugin::App::AmsterdamX.pm > to make things clear. > Yes, that's Sawyer's namespace. > See http://amsterdamx.pm/ > > Joy, >> `/anick >> > > -- > Henk > > _______________________________________________ > dancer-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users >
_______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
