On 17 apr 2013, at 02:39, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is not an erratum, it is a proposal to add operational guidance for how 
> TLS servers should act when an associated TLSA record of a certain type would 
> be used. The guidance is correct, but it is not an erratum.

I agree, it should not be an erratum.

        jakob

_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to