Paul Hoffman wrote: > > This is not an erratum, it is a proposal to add operational guidance > for how TLS servers should act when an associated TLSA record of a > certain type would be used. The guidance is correct, but it is not > an erratum.
Erratums _include_ omissions. We talked about this issue on the DANE mailing list, e.g. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg04252.html but the necessary information appears to have been omitted from the final document, so posting this errata now is perfectly valid. -Martin _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
