On Jun 23, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > Please note that this is to support non-TLS scenarios where the public > key might not be transfered in-band like in the TLS case.
I see nothing in the draft that suggests that it would update 6698 to cover any protocol other than TLS and DTLS. If the WG adopts the document, the document should be clearer that the keying material is only for TLS and DTLS. Any other use would require a different protocol document that would use a different RRtype (even if that RRtype uses the same record format. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
