Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:
>> beyond even raw public keys). My best guess is that were some
>> other kind of "key material" to be used with TLS, that is not in
>> SPKI format,
> Please note that this is to support non-TLS scenarios where the public
> key might not be transfered in-band like in the TLS case. That is,
> the draft extends 6698 to support publishing any kind of public key
> in SPKI format for verification. It does not suggest non-SPKI formats.
When you write SPKI, do you mean rfc2692/93? Or something else?
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
