On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:54:02PM -0400, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
> This means that now that both the "Service" DANE documents have now entered
> the RFC editors queue and the OPS document is in IESG review.
Thanks. One quick note, I made a mistake in the most recent update
to the OPS document. I'll push a "-12" version that fixes the
problem. This will also add a note to explain why mixing "3 1 1"
for a past SPKI with "2 0 1" for a replacement cert is wrong and
the migragation from DANE-EE(3) to DANE-TA(2) was correct in "-10"
(and is now wrong in "-11").
This is not anything new, just application of previous text to the
migration example, but the example will help to clarify the text.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
