On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:

The chairs want to thank Victor for his outstanding work on getting the draft 
to this point.

Indeed. Thanks for your hard work on the specification and the
implementation Viktor!

We are reaching the point that the core DANE protocol work is complete. 
At this point the WG has a choice as to what direction to take
a) Finish work on OPENPGP and S/MIME documents and close down

Not against that.

b) Start work on DANE-bis document(s) that combines the Protocol parts of the 4 
documents that define the
DANE protocol. 

Not against that either, although that should not be interpreted as
volunteering :)

c) Just work on promoting existing RFC along the standards track

I'm a little concerned if we don't do this, where those documents will
go to get discussed at all. SAAG? Then again, I think most of the new work
would mostly be based on the existing documents, and not contain much
"invention" that needs the guidance of experts. So this is a possible
option as well.

d) Identify and adopt other documents that are needed for DANE 
adoptions/operations/specifications 

I still have an IPsec one pending, but most of those issues are with
IPsec and not with the relatively simple DANE, so that could find
an audience in ipsecme (providing it is not closing down too)

Paul

_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to