On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:39:49PM +0000, Osterweil, Eric wrote:
> Another point: the chances that a zone may already want to use "_at"
> for some other reasons (and thus causing a collision) are higher than the
> more descriptive "_openpgpkey," or "_smimecert" labels.
There's no "collision". The records are disambiguated well enough
by the RRtype. Few enough domains are using "_at", to make this
a concern.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
dane@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
