On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
This is a second WGLC where the chairs ask the following question Do you support the publication of this document as an EXPERIMENTAL RFC?
A few minor changes: Section 3 uses an unnumbered list but the content of one bullet point refers to "step 2". I recommend changing this to a numbered list as in RFC7929. Additionally, this "step 2" should be "step 5", as filed with the RFC7929 errata: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7929 (the second errata is already applied to this document) Section 10 needs to be updated to refer to RFC7929 :) I am in favour of publishing this document as an Experimental RFC. Paul _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
