I've read this document and I support publication. I'm more inclined to publish as Experimental, but I'm not beholden to the correct flavor.
tim On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Jim Reid <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 09:19, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I am in favour of publishing this document as an Experimental RFC. > > I support publication of this document too: don't care which flavour of > RFC is chosen for it. > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane >
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
