Hi Ben, On 16/03/17 02:09, Ben Campbell wrote: > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dane-smime-15: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smime/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > There's a rather icky IPR disclosure that basically says that licensing > terms won't be disclosed until they see where the draft is going.
Yeah, this same "tell ya later, maybe" situation has hit other drafts in the last year or so, regrettably from the same source. Fully agreeing about the icckiness, I did explicitly ask about this in my AD review [1] and we gave participants a week or so to object to progressing and none did as you can see from that thread. Cheers, S. [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg08511.html > The > shepherd's review doesn't mention whether the working group discussed > that. Since this is experimental, it probably doesn't matter very much > right now. I hope that gets some discussion prior to any attempt to > promote this work to standards track. > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
