The working group discussed this and decided to move forward.
Ólafur
On March 16, 2017 3:09:56 AM GMT+01:00, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
>Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>draft-ietf-dane-smime-15: No Objection
>
>When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>Please refer to
>https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smime/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>There's a rather icky IPR disclosure that basically says that licensing
>terms won't be disclosed until they see where the draft is going. The
>shepherd's review doesn't mention whether the working group discussed
>that. Since this is experimental, it probably doesn't matter very much
>right now. I hope that gets some discussion prior to any attempt to
>promote this work to standards track.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
