i would recommend just using the native one. The best performance that I was able to get with ghc 6.6 was still seven times slower then the native sha1 implementation.
2008/1/23 Peter Verswyvelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Maybe a dedicated SIMD version of SHA1? > > http://arctic.org/~dean/crypto/sha1.html > > Cheers, > Peter > > > David Roundy wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:26:51PM +0000, Simon Marlow wrote: > > > There are still times when I see nothing happening, for example in the > unpull test on the GHC repo (see previous messages), the last progress > message I get is > > Reading patches in /64playpen/simonmar/ghc-darcs2 17040 > > and it sits there for 7-8 seconds before completing. Does this maybe shed > any light on why this unpull is 2 times slower than darcs1? > > I'm not entirely certain what's triggering this, but I have identified that > removing a couple of sha1 checks cuts 1s out of 15s for me. This makes me > wonder whether it's worth looking into a faster sha1 implementation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
