> I still think that we shouldn't put tools into the darcs repository that we > aren't willing to support. For instance, I'd rather take darcs.cgi out > than add darcsweb in. (No, this isn't a threat to take darcs.cgi out, but > merely to point out that just because it's distributed with darcs doesn't > mean it works... as discovered recently when someone tried to use > darcs.cgi.)
Would a dedicated/standalone darcs-contrib repository be useful? (we could move darcs.cgi there). I suppose we could use a cursory-review model, where we basically push in anything that looks like it was submitted in good faith. Maybe it would help for collecting a bunch of little scripts that nobody really wants to maintain. I have no opinion on the matter. Zooko: if you think this may be a good idea, would you be willing to take care of it? I guess we could host it on darcs.net if David agrees. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users