On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 15:19:46 -0400, Max Battcher wrote: > meaningful when it shows up in .dpatch-es. For instance, "Patch-salt:" > would provide more information about what that field is and why the UI > hides it but it is contained in the patches. Or maybe something even > more generic, for instance "Hidden:", if there are plans to use these > hidden fields for other purposes such as third party patch metadata (or > user metadata).
Interesting thought. The code is designed to allow us to rename or add more ignorable fields in the future. Indeed "Patch salt" sounds more informative. Send a patch? > By the way, with the way the behavior works in pre3, if I add an > "Ignore-this:" line of my own anywhere in the long description, does it > also become invisible in the darcs UI? Yes -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpYfIiZGEogF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
