On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 01:09:55PM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > Here's an amended refactor of my previous pre/post-hook change. I'm > still hoping for comments from someone other than Jason. Not that I > don't appreciate Jason's comments, but given that we disagree it seems > like a good idea to get more feedback from *someone*.
I have to admit that I have been bitten by not always remembering to set a run-posthook. If I specify a posthook, I expect it to run. I remember, also, being pleasantly surprised by the availability of prompt-posthook. If there is some command that I sometimes want to run, but often not, it adds a nice interactive nature to the posthook. I do not have to remember to supply a no-posthook on the command-line, instead I am prompted. I would recommend making run-posthook the default, or eliminating it. I would recommend keeping prompt-posthook as an option. -kolibrie _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
