On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Nathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 01:09:55PM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > > Here's an amended refactor of my previous pre/post-hook change. I'm > > still hoping for comments from someone other than Jason. Not that I > > don't appreciate Jason's comments, but given that we disagree it seems > > like a good idea to get more feedback from *someone*. > [snip] > > I would recommend making run-posthook the default, or eliminating it. > > I would recommend keeping prompt-posthook as an option. > This is similar what I was recommending, but in many fewer words. I'm also advocating we keep the option for disabling the posthook. Since we have no libdarcs we need commandline switches to be able to control the way darcs works, especially when invoked by another program. Thanks Jason
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
