On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 22:37:07 +0300, Pavel Shramov wrote: > > Please submit a type signature for this function in a future patch. > > I've updated http://wiki.darcs.net/index.html/CodingStyle with a > > request for top-level type signatures :-)
> It's there... > > src/Darcs/Arguments.lhs > 468 pipe_interactive, all_pipe_interactive, all_interactive, all_patches, > interactive, pipe, > ... > 475 output, output_auto_name, unidiff, repo_combinator, > 476 unified, summary, uncompress_nocompress, subject, in_reply_to, > <---- here :) <----- Whoops, sorry about that! > Maybe it's better to split this blob and put each type signature near > definition? Good idea > Unfortunately I've never used haddock and make_email function was > missing documentation. So I've not added description of headers argument > to it. Yeah. It's one of darcs Causes: trying to make the code more approachable to incoming developers (and to ourselves) by laying down more documentation. So we try to coax as many people as we can into laying down an API doc or two. Someday the haddockification will be complete! http://www.haskell.org/haddock/doc/html/index.html -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
