Hi, On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 21:49:37 -0600, Tom Hawkins wrote: > We use darcs at work; and it works great.
Thanks for the encouragement. > The one exception is it's slow. We are still on 1.0.9 due to cygwin > support, so maybe things have greatly improved. I'll refer you to Zooko's response > But in case they haven't, I'm wondering if > anyone has considered using digital fountain codes as a means to > communicate patches between repositories? With apologies for being obtuse, this is something you are proposing as a way of speeding up operations like darcs get and pull. In other words, this is proposed as an optimisation? My reading of the below was that we could use this as a way to simultaneously fetch different pieces of the same patch(es) from more than place. Sorry for trying to executive-summarise it :-) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
