On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:21:12 +0100, Petr Rockai wrote: > So who's with me that for 2.3, we should add a "bucketed" keyword to our > _darcs/format and start using it? Moreover, we need to do the same to our > global cache, by now I get the following: > > 10:19:06 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ -> l ~/.darcs/cache/pristine.hashed | wc -l > 40645 > 10:19:10 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ -> l ~/.darcs/cache/patches | wc -l > 86769
This might be a good idea. I suppose --no-buckets would have to be the default until we are fairly sure that bucket-capable darcs is in enough people's hands. We wouldn't want somebody to install darcs 2.3 on their server and then have people fail to fetch patches with darcs 2.2 (although at least the repo formats mechanism should make it fail gracefully and maybe buy us a few more upgrades?) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
