On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Petr Rockai<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,this is an alternative "hlint" patch, that actually replaces haskell_policy. It only catches and reports actual errors, so there's no issue with huge output. It also provides a ratification mechanism, so it is possible to make the test pass (we need to use the unsafe functions from time to time). Nevertheless, even though the test passes now, it should probably wait till the hlint cpp issue [1] is fixed. [1]: http://code.google.com/p/ndmitchell/issues/detail?id=137 Yours, Petr. Fri Aug 7 08:57:36 CEST 2009 Petr Rockai <[email protected]> * Re-implement haskell_policy in terms of hlint. This also comes with a change to the ratification mechanism, which now uses a separate Ratified module, from which you have to import the unsafe functions. Requires a recent hlint.
Is there any reason that this couldn't've been based on my patches? Re-doing work is bad; I note that you omitted adding -fwarn-tabs to darcs.cabal, for example. -- gwern
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
