On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 15:27:26 -0400, Nathan Gray wrote: > I am also concerned, as Zooko pointed out, that switching to > darcs-2 format will be very inconvenient.
Just to be clear in case anyof us are concerned that this is going to be an issue: I think you can count on support for the different darcs semantics pretty much indefinitely. That's the default assumption anyway. I don't foresee ever withdrawing darcs-1 or in the future darcs-2 support. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpGPGX5Hnkad.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
