Sorry for taking so long with this. On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Eric Kow <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 14:09:16 -0700, Eric Kow wrote: > > I think it's most realistic to go for Darcs 2.4.0. > > > > Wed Sep 23 23:08:11 CEST 2009 Eric Kow <[email protected]> > > * Resolve issue1583: on darcs get, suggest upgrading source repo to > hashed. > > Nudge :-) > Could I get a volunteer to add a test case for this? The test needs to cover 4 cases: local repo supports hashed, remote supports hashed local repo supports hashed, remote does not support hashed local repo does not support hashed, remote supports hashed local repo does not support hashed, remote does not support hashed It should be in the quick and easy category for anyone familiar with sh. The patch itself looks good to me. Applied, thanks! Jason
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
