On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:15:33 +0000, Trent W. Buck wrote: > + "Patch bundle failed hash!\n" ++ > + "This probably means that the patch has > been "++ > + "corrupted by a mailer.\n"++ > + "The most likely culprit is CRLF > newlines." ++ > + "\n\nExpected: " ++ show expected ++ > + "\nReceived: " ++ show received
So, here's a little thought that's been nagging at me: would this create a significant risk of tempting users to just paste in the 'right' hash to just make things work? I guess they'd get what they deserve... -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpfJNHTBlJmT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
