On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:20:58 +0000, Eric Kow wrote: > > + "Patch bundle failed hash!\n" ++ > > + "This probably means that the patch has > > been "++ > > + "corrupted by a mailer.\n"++ > > + "The most likely culprit is CRLF > > newlines." ++ > > + "\n\nExpected: " ++ show expected ++ > > + "\nReceived: " ++ show received
The implementation seems fine (tiny refactor and readability tweak), but I've marked issue1671 wont-fix for fear of users shooting themselves in the foot (since you can delete the hash anyway). Thanks, though... -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
