Max Battcher <[email protected]> writes: > [...] Of course, RFC822 is full of loopholes and surprisingly hard to > parse in reality [...] I think I have a reasonable suggestion that is > easier to parse than RFC822, but carries a similar effect: YAML > formatted darcs comments.
Can you support this claim? > [...] YAML is still easy to parse, with libraries in many languages. Unless you're planning to emit YAML directly (instead of not-quite-XML, as we currently do in darcs changes --xml), the only implementation language that matters in Haskell. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
