Hi, I also feel that 2.5.x line should be bugfixes on the 2.5 series
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:53:43 +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: > Those are the issue 1599 fix by Adolfo that just landed in the patch > tracker (and will need some review and probably at least one amendment > iteration). Any reason that this urgently needs to go in? It seems it suffices to be principled about the freeze here and wait for Darcs 2.6. > The other is the http packs stuff, which is partially in, but it's not > in a good enough shape for release (due to --lazy breakage, etc.). We don't necessarily have to roll this back to exclude it. A simpler options might be to create a patch to just ignore the pack fetching functionality. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, please try +44 (0)1273 64 2905.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
